They want me to feel good about making sure someone doesn't get bashed over the head because they are "different" and if they do, it should be punished more harshly than the original crime.
But then I found out the bill protects pedophiles from "hate crimes". Where did I find this out? On the pedophile forum boards of course!
On Boychat.org http://boychat.org/messages/1168770.htm, "Andre" gloats about how the attempt to remove "philias" from the bill failed, these included "apotemnophilia, asphyxophilia, autogynephilia, coprophilia, exhibitionism, fetishism, frotteurism, gerontosexuality, incest, kleptophilia, klismaphilia, necrophilia, partialism, pedophilia, sexual masochism, sexual sadism, telephone seatalogia, toucherism, transgenderism, transsexual, transvestite, transvestic fetishism, urophilia, voyeurism, or zoophilia":
Incest? Necrophilia? Pedophilia? You're joking, right?
Um... no. Check this out:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=97095
Time to write your senator and tell him to vote NO.
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1913/show
Please... because if a pedophile rapes my kid and I punch him in the face, I don't wanna be arrested for a hate crime. Seriously folks... write your Senator!
What could possibly be more of a HATE CRIME than molesting a child???
ReplyDeleteLet's make it a hate crime and perhaps FINALLY someone will give these sick twists an appropriate sentence.
One strike you're out.
I'm sure if you punched them in self defense it wouldn't be classed as a hate crime...
ReplyDeleteFurthermore, if you're punching a rapist for being a rapist that's not a hate crime because 'rapist' isn't a protected group. Just like if you punched a black guy who raped your wife you wouldn't be persecuted for racism.