Thursday, October 22, 2009

HR 1913 - Why you should stop this bill from passing

Stop "hate crimes"? Sounds cool! But wait... what the heck... are these people trying to trick me?

They want me to feel good about making sure someone doesn't get bashed over the head because they are "different" and if they do, it should be punished more harshly than the original crime.

But then I found out the bill protects pedophiles from "hate crimes". Where did I find this out? On the pedophile forum boards of course!

On, "Andre" gloats about how the attempt to remove "philias" from the bill failed, these included "apotemnophilia, asphyxophilia, autogynephilia, coprophilia, exhibitionism, fetishism, frotteurism, gerontosexuality, incest, kleptophilia, klismaphilia, necrophilia, partialism, pedophilia, sexual masochism, sexual sadism, telephone seatalogia, toucherism, transgenderism, transsexual, transvestite, transvestic fetishism, urophilia, voyeurism, or zoophilia":

Incest? Necrophilia? Pedophilia? You're joking, right?

Um... no. Check this out:

Time to write your senator and tell him to vote NO.

Please... because if a pedophile rapes my kid and I punch him in the face, I don't wanna be arrested for a hate crime. Seriously folks... write your Senator!


  1. What could possibly be more of a HATE CRIME than molesting a child???

    Let's make it a hate crime and perhaps FINALLY someone will give these sick twists an appropriate sentence.

    One strike you're out.

  2. I'm sure if you punched them in self defense it wouldn't be classed as a hate crime...

    Furthermore, if you're punching a rapist for being a rapist that's not a hate crime because 'rapist' isn't a protected group. Just like if you punched a black guy who raped your wife you wouldn't be persecuted for racism.